Many companies are not listed but depend on one or two key accounts: industrial suppliers, service providers, carriers, construction subcontractors. Mac Mahon Avocats handles the legal and financial consequences of that dependence — imposed price revisions, extended payment terms, termination of a framework agreement, or insolvency proceedings opened against the customer.
| Situation | Main legal basis | What is at stake |
|---|---|---|
| Termination without sufficient notice | Art. L.442-1, II Commercial Code | Damages based on margin lost over the notice period |
| Imposed terms, significant imbalance | Art. L.442-1, I | Challenging clauses and penalties |
| Late payment | Art. L.441-10 et seq. | Interest, fixed indemnity, formal notice |
| Customer in insolvency proceedings | Book VI Commercial Code | Claim filing, ongoing contracts, reclaiming goods |
| Construction subcontracting | Act no. 75-1334 of 31 Dec. 1975 | Approval, guarantee, direct payment |
| Own cash position under strain | Art. L.611-3 et seq. | Mandat ad hoc, conciliation, safeguard |
General information only; this page is not legal advice.
Claims arising before the opening judgment must be filed with the creditors' representative, in principle within two months of publication in the BODACC (four months for creditors domiciled outside metropolitan France). Supplies made after the opening, for the purposes of the proceedings, are in principle paid when due.
Not unilaterally for ongoing contracts: Article L.622-13 of the Commercial Code gives the court-appointed administrator the option to continue the contract and prohibits termination on the sole ground of the opening. Post-opening supplies must, however, be paid; failure to pay when due can be relied upon.
Article L.442-1, II of the Commercial Code sanctions the abrupt termination of an established commercial relationship without written notice reflecting the duration of the relationship. Damages are in principle based on the margin lost over the notice period that should have been given.
No. Dependence is not wrongful as such, but it may form the background for a finding of significant imbalance or abuse, assessed case by case by the courts.
Yes. Act no. 75-1334 of 31 December 1975 requires the project owner to approve subcontractors and provides for direct payment in public contracts, and for a guarantee or delegation of payment in private contracts.
A first confidential discussion helps prioritise: securing claims, challenging a termination, or opening confidential out-of-court proceedings.
Book a meeting Call +33 1 45 03 20 20 Contact form
Law firm registered with the Paris Bar — 33 avenue Mac-Mahon, 75017 Paris, France.